Posts Tagged investment
Life Science and Investment Partnership Opportunities with China – 2015 OneMed Forum & OneMed China Forum
Posted by Darshana V. Nadkarni, Ph.D. in Big Data -Cloud -IoT-Software -Mobile -Entrepreneurship, Biotech - Medical Device - Life Science - Healthcare on January 21, 2015
Opportunities and challenges for life science companies, in working with China, was a big focus of OneMed Forum, 2015. OneMed Forum 2015, took place at the same time JP Morgan event was happening in San Francisco.

USS San Francisco (CA-38) entering San Francisco Bay under the Golden Gate Bridge, December 1942. The structure on the lower left is Fort Point. This picture was taken December 11, 1942, as the USS San Francisco, severely damaged in the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal the previous month, returns to her namesake city. The ship was en route to the Mare Island Navy Yard for repairs. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The OneMed Forum conference with a mission to bring healthcare companies and investors together, opened on January 12, 2015 with a panel that discussed Opportunities in China. China has seen a very rapid economic growth that has spurred tremendous interest in investing in promising products and technologies, particularly in the healthcare arena. This panel explored strategies to access the Chinese market. There was a lot of stress on getting local partners early on. The panel also discussed deal structure alternatives for companies looking to secure capital, as well as licensing and distribution opportunities in China. (PS – please see link http://bit.ly/Zcwxqi for Life Science job opportunities in China)
After OneMed Conference ended on January, 13th, OneMedChina conference occurred at the same venue. After the opening remarks by Tony Chu, Founder and Partner with The Pharma Partners, a panel discussed a topic of great general interest “Investing in America”. It is no more that American companies are chasing Chinese investors, but also many Chinese investors are actively seeking investment opportunities in North America and Europe, particularly in the healthcare arena. There is a great deal of interest among Chinese investors in technologies that would address Chinese and global markets. The panel of experts included, Mr. Kevin Chen, Partner and Head of Healthcare Investment, Sequoia Capital China, Mr. Xiangyu Ouyang, Partner & Head of Healthcare Investment, Legend Capital, Dr. David Wang, Partner, OrbiMed China and Mr. Edward Zhou, Partner and Head of Healthcare Investment, New Horizon Capital. The panel shared insights on investment strategy to follow and shared their current global investment focus.
Next panel on “How to build a successful partnership with a Chinese company” was represented by Dr. Sanuj Ravindran, Global Head of Business Ventures, The Medicine Company and Mr. Andrew Wong, VP of Business Development at SciClone Corporation. Both panelists stressed the need for local partners. Wong said that hiring a local advisor will help bridge the culture gap. Ravindran stressed the need to get on the ground and spend some time to get business and cultural understanding for such partnership to get off to a good start.
These panels were followed by lunch with extended networking time. Rooms for one on one discussions between investors and companies were also available.
2012 WSGR Annual Medical Device Conference – opening panel
Posted by Darshana V. Nadkarni, Ph.D. in Biotech - Medical Device - Life Science - Healthcare on June 23, 2012
Each year, Wilson Sonsini, Goodrich, and Rosati Medical Device Conference, brings together industry CEOs, venture capitalists, industry strategists, investment bankers, market analysts and other professions to understand the challenges and opportunities facing the medtech industry. The conference this year, focused on gaining insights and a deeper understanding of the challenges facing the Medtech start-ups and the strategies that can be effective in responding to these challenges.
The opening panel was moderated by Marty Waters, Partner at WSGR and focused on where the medtech investment is happening. Despite over $2.8 billion invested in medtech venture deals in 2011, clearly the major common agreement among panelists was that medtech funding is significantly down. Mike Carusi, General Partner with Advanced Technology Ventures explained, “we have investors too” and they are not investing significantly in medtech funds. When they do invest, Carusi elaborated, they look for opportunities addressing a drug market and his advice was that entrepreneurs figure out ways in leveraging the ecosystem. Yuval Binur, Managing Parnter at Orchestra Medical Ventures, advised that entrepreneurs focus not only on unmet clinical areas but also focus on unmet strategic needs. As VCs, he elaborated, “we need to fund strategic partners who can help with commercialization” and he advised that entrepreneurs pay attention to and build relationships with strategic partners. Using anecdotes, analogies, and terminology from Hollywood, John Friedman, Managing Partner & Founder with Easton Capital, said, “we need to go back to the future”, and if VCs see many companies being funded in the same area, they need to move away from it. Voicing a slightly different opinion from Binur, Friedman said, VCs should invest in companies that focus on fundamentally unmet needs or are developing standard of care at 10-20% of the cost. He said VCs are moving away from early stage and are looking at deals which are capital efficient. Strategically, it is much more important to dominate the region locally, which is also easier and more effective, said Friedman. Opining on emergence of wireless technology, he advised that in more of a serviceable model, the leaner the IP, more protectable it is.
Bill Harrington, Managing Partner with Osage University Partners, agreed, the age of incrementalism and me-too’s is gone. Basic, hypothesis based research is happening in Universities and their fund focuses on capturing that. They have an increasing database of university partners with access to participating companies. Harrington added, that while device companies mostly have one formidable asset, with pharma companies, there is more of a possibility to do licensing deals or license assets. There is greater interest in late stage deals because with market traction, there is some indication if it is strategically advantageous and how it is doing, said Harrington. A lot of companies highly underestimate the risks and costs of commercialization. Speaking on emergence of wireless technology, Harrington said that outside the medical field, technology is rapidly moving ahead but they still lack intelligent ways to use the data and there are opportunities in that area. Dirk Kersten, Partner with Gilde Healthcare Partners, said, they are looking at companies with reasonably good products serving real market needs. With wireless technology, there are huge opportunities in home health care, to provide better care, cheaper and for longer duration, said Kersten.
The blogs that follow will focus on other discussions.
Reader Comments